Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.74 seconds)Section 125 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 33 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Hardie Trading Ltd. And Anr vs Addisons Paint And Chemicals Ltd on 12 September, 2003
In Hardie Trading Ltd v. Addisons Paint & Chemicals
Ltd, (2003) 11 SCC 92, the Supreme Court held that unlike a
petition under Section 47 of the TM Act on the ground of non-use
which requires the petitioner to show that it will possibly suffer if
the impugned entry is allowed to subsist, the locus standi under
Section 57 should be construed liberally to correct a public mischief
in the interest of maintaining the purity of the register.
18
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/06/2025 08:07:36 pm )
(T)OP(TM) Nos.368 to 370, 460, 461 & 464/2023
Austin Nichols And Co. And Seagram India ... vs Arvind Behl, Director, Jagatjit ... on 29 November, 2005
(ix) Austin Nichols & Co. v. Arvind Behl
[2005 SCC OnLine Del 1276]
Choice Hotels International Inc vs M Sanjay Kumar And Anr on 9 February, 2015
(xi) Choice Hotels International Inc. v. M.
Sanjay Kumar and Anr. 2015 SCC OnLine
Del 7407]
Rolex Sa vs Alex Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. & Others on 15 September, 2014
(xiii) Rolex SA v. Alex Jewellary Pvt. Ltd. &
Ors. [2014 SCC OnLine Del 1619]