Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.23 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad vs Jainul Islam & Abr on 21 January, 1998
For acquisition of
land for the purposes of any of the schemes under the said Acts, the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 has been made applicable with certain modifications
as contained in the schedule to the said Acts which are numerous and
substantial. The modification made are also similar. We have found no
distinction in the three Acts which may have a bearing on the question
relating to legislative incorporation of the Land Acquisition Act in the
State Acts. We are, therefore, of the view that what has been held by this
Court in U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Jainul Islam and anr., (supra)
with regard to U.P. Act holds good for the Punjab Act as well as the Nagpur
Act, Consequently we are unable to subscribe to the view taken in Bhatinda
Improvement Trust v. Dalwant Singh and Ors., (supra) that the provisions of
the Land Acquisition Act have not been incorporated into the Punjab Act and
that they have merely been cited or referred to in the Punjab Act."
Section 55 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Nagpur Improvement Trust And Another vs Vithal Rao And Others on 11 December, 1972
In Venkat Rao (supra) insertion of Section 17-A was noticed
which, as noticed hereinbefore, provides that the land has first to be
acquired by the Collector for the Government and thereafter it is
transferred by the Government to the Mahapalika only on payment of its
costs.
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Secy. Of State vs Hindusthan Co-Operative Insurance ... on 18 August, 1931
whether the amendment in the Land Acquisition Act was applicable so as to
confer a right of appeal to the Privy Council against the judgment of the
High Court in an appeal from the Tribunal. The said question was answered
in the negative by the Privy Council. This Court quoted the following
passages appearing in Secretary of State v. Hindustan Cooperative Insurance
Society Ltd. (supra).