Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.64 seconds)
Sri Bashyakara Adichenna ... vs Smt.N.Padmavathi (Deceased) on 7 November, 2017 cites

S. Bagirathi Ammal vs Palani Roman Catholic Mission on 6 December, 2007

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the appellant would contend that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.Bagirathi Ammal v. Palani Roman Catholic Mission, 2007 (5) CTC 881, has discussed the matter elaborately and found that deposit of money will not satisfy the ingredients of Section 9 (3) fully and, unless sale deed is executed, the proceedings do not come to a close and it cannot be deemed that matter has reached finality. Therefore, whatever proceedings are pending shall abate and the right of the tenant ceases. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has discussed the issue on the subject matter, which is pending before the Full Bench of this Court, as under :
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 435 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Arulmigu Kasi Viswanathaswamy ... vs Kasthuriammal on 7 April, 2006

11) Finally, Mr. M.N.Krishnamani placing reliance on the Full Bench decision of the Madras High Court rendered in CRP(NPD) 2758 of 1996 titled Arulmigu Kasi Viswanathaswamy Devasthanam vs. Kasthuriammal submitted that the moment tenant deposited the amount the order is fully satisfied. He further pointed out that as per the said decision the moment the order under Section 9 (3) (a) is passed, it shall be construed that the proceedings got terminated and the suit stood dismissed as per Section 9 (3)
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 11 - M K Vinayagam - Full Document
1