Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.25 seconds)

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

12. The rule of equality in public employment is a basic feature of our constitution and if appointment is made flouting the rules, without proper competition among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. Assuming the appointment is contractual appointment or daily wage or casual basis, the same would come to an end when it is discontinued. Followed the decision of the Hon' ble Supreme Court reported in (Secretary, State of Karnataka and others vs. Umadevi (3) and others) (2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases 1 ( Constitution Bench) cited supra. In that decision, it was held that merely because a temporary employee or casual wage worker continued for a time beyond the terms of his appointment, he would not be entitled to be absorbed in a regular service or made permanent, merely on the strength of such discontinuance, if the original appointment was not made by following a due process of selection as envisaged by the relevant rules. In that case, it was further held that it is not open to the Court to prevent the regular recruitment a t the instance of temporary employees whose period of employment has come to an end or of ad hoc employees who by the very nature of their appointment do not acquire any right.
1   2 3 Next