Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.36 seconds)Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 338 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Haryana Pesticides And Ors. vs The Bank Of Rajasthan Ltd. And Anr. on 7 August, 2003
The original policy was in also in his
possession. The appellant could not have lodged the claim with the
respondent insurance company in the absence of the insurance policy.
In the application dated 18.12.2008 filed by respondents no.1 to 3 for
supply of the documents, it was specifically pleaded that the policy
supplied by the appellant to the insurance company is a third party
policy and was not covering the risk of theft. The appellant has set up a
new case and the judgment relied upon by him of the Hon'ble National
Commission is not applicable, whereas the judgments in cases "UCO
Bank Vs Gadadhar Mahapatra", 2007-(1) CPJ-29 (NC); "Haryana
First Appeal No.1036 of 2009 7
Pesticides Vs Bank of Rajasthan", AIR 2004 P & H-83 are applicable
and the appeal is liable to be dismissed.
Uco Bank vs Gadadhar Mohapatra on 13 November, 2006
The original policy was in also in his
possession. The appellant could not have lodged the claim with the
respondent insurance company in the absence of the insurance policy.
In the application dated 18.12.2008 filed by respondents no.1 to 3 for
supply of the documents, it was specifically pleaded that the policy
supplied by the appellant to the insurance company is a third party
policy and was not covering the risk of theft. The appellant has set up a
new case and the judgment relied upon by him of the Hon'ble National
Commission is not applicable, whereas the judgments in cases "UCO
Bank Vs Gadadhar Mahapatra", 2007-(1) CPJ-29 (NC); "Haryana
First Appeal No.1036 of 2009 7
Pesticides Vs Bank of Rajasthan", AIR 2004 P & H-83 are applicable
and the appeal is liable to be dismissed.
1