Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.33 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Virender Nanda @ Dimple vs State [Along With Crl. A. 723/2002] on 23 July, 2007
In having this view, I find support from the
judgment titled as Sanjeev Nanda v The State, Crl.
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Dharam Pal And Ors vs State Of U.P on 4 January, 2008
PP in
support of her arguments relied upon the judgment cited as Dharam
Pal vs. State of U.P., AIR 2008 SC 920, wherein, it was held that :
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of U.P vs Ramesh Prasad Misra And Anr on 13 August, 1996
PP relied upon the judgment
cited as State of U.P. v. Ramesh Prasad Misra and another (1996)
10 SCC 360, wherein it was held that :
"It is equally settled law that the evidence of a hostile witness
would not be totally rejected if spoken in favour of the
prosecution or the accused, but it can be subjected to close
scrutiny and that portion of the evidence which is consistent
with the case of prosecution or defence may be accepted."
Radha Mohan Singh @ Lal Saheb & Others vs State Of U.P on 20 January, 2006
Ld. Addl. PP also relied upon the judgment cited as Radha
Mohan Singh vs. State of U.P., AIR 2006 SC 951.