Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.52 seconds)
Panipat Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd vs Presiding Officer And Another on 31 July, 2009 cites

H.U.D.A vs Jagmal Singh on 13 July, 2006

It would be unfair to the learned counsel for the appellant, if we do not deal with the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in H.U.D.A. Vs. Jagmal Singh Civil Appeal No.5361 of 2005 decided on 13.7.2006 (copy Letters Patent Appeal No.578 of 2009 -9- whereof was placed on record in the instant appeal as Annexure P-8), on which reliance had been placed during the course of hearing. The issue adjudicated upon by the learned Single Judge as also by us herein, is whether or not the respondent-workman must be deemed to have been paid for rest days under the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (as well the as Rules framed thereunder). Since neither the aforestated Act or Rules were subject matter of consideration in the judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant, we are satisfied that the same cannot be relied upon to record a finding one way or the other in the present controversy.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document
1