Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (3.76 seconds)

Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U.P. And Others on 7 December, 2007

A perusal of the said judgment would show that in the said case, High Court had entertained the petition filed under Section 482 NITIN 2022.09.26 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 16 CRM-M-42558-2022 of Cr.P.C. and directions had been issued to register the FIR and after considering the earlier judgment passed in Sakiri Vasu (Supra), Hon'ble the Supreme Court had set aside the order passed by the High Court observing that in case, such like petitions are entertained by the High Courts, then the High Courts will be flooded with such petitions and will not be able to do any other work except dealing with such petitions and further observed that the complainant must avail his alternative remedy to approach the Magistrate concerned under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., 1973.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 8229 - M Katju - Full Document
1   2 Next