Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)

Smt. Ramesh Kumari vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 July, 2016

3. On 6.5.2016, the complainant received a notice from the court of learned Civil Judge, Patiala House in respect of civil suit bearing no. 190/2015 titled as "Smt. Lamkaur Vs. State of NCT of Delhi". The petitioner and her father visited the court on 13.5.2016 and noticed that a group of people, including three men and two women, were discussing the said case. The petitioner heard them discussing certain documents pertaining to her late W.P(Crl) 1702/2019 Page 2 of 12 grandmother‟s properties in Ghaziabad and Noida and saying that due to bad photocopying name of Labh Kaur was read as „Lam Kaur‟, because of which, the suit was filed in the name of „Lam Kaur‟. The petitioner took the photographs of all these persons and when the case was called, one of the two women presented herself as „Lam Kaur‟ and proposed to move an application for correction of the name. At that time, the petitioner and her father appeared before the court along with their lawyer and brought the true facts in the knowledge of the court and informed that the original „Labh Kaur‟ had passed away several years ago i.e in 2010 and plaintiff-lady before the court was an imposter. The matter was passed over and the court directed all the parties to produce their identity cards. When the matter was called again, no one appeared from the side of the plaintiff and the petitioner, on her part, submitted copies of the passport and death certificate of her grandparents namely Late S. Sohan Singh and Late „Labh Kaur‟. The court after taking serious view in the matter directed SHO, P.S. Chankyapuri to submit a report in this regard. On 27.5.2016 which was the next date of hearing the concerned Judge directed the police officials from P.S.Tilak Marg to register an appropriate case if any impersonation or cognizable offence was made out. Upon inquiry, it was revealed that the said „Lam Kaur‟ was actually one Krishna Wanti and was impersonating as the petitioner‟s grandmother.
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 1 - V Sanghi - Full Document
1