Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.41 seconds)

C.V. Ratnam vs Union Of India And Ors. on 18 August, 2001

However, so far as the conclusion on the Point No.2 is concerned, it is contended by Sri D. Prakash Reddy, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the writ petitioners that the State Commission committed a grave error in holding that the petitions under Section 27 were maintainable even before the order of the Commission attained finality in terms of Section 24 of the Act. Relying upon a decision of the Full Bench of this Court in C.V. RATNAM v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.2 the learned Senior Counsel submitted that the State Commission is competent to entertain the proceedings under Section 27 of the Act only when the order made under Section 17 (a) (i) becomes final as provided under Section 24 of the Act.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 80 - Cited by 7 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 Next