Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.29 seconds)

Smt. Kanta Devi vs Union Of India And Anr on 12 March, 2003

"These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2010, made by the learned Single Judge whereby four writ petitions, being CWP No.3493 of 2009, titled Kanta Devi vs. Union of India and others, CWP No.3497 of 2009, titled Basanti Devi and others vs. Union of India and others, CWP No.3756 of 2009, titled Meera Devi vs. Union of India and others and CWP No.3936 of 2009, titled Maheshwari Devi vs. Union of India and others, came to be allowed with a command to the writ respondents to release the amount of gratuity and leave encashment as per the break-ups given in para-6 of the judgment (for short "the impugned judgment").
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 39 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Miss Mohini Jain vs State Of Karnataka And Ors on 30 July, 1992

This Court in Mohini Jain v. Stale of Karnataka and Others, [1992] 3 SCC 666 held as under (SCC p. 682, para 17) "We hold that every citizen has a "right to education" under the Constitution. The State is under an obligation to establish educational institutions to enable the citizens to enjoy the said right. The State may discharge its obligation through state-owned or state- recognised educational institutions, When the State Government grants recognition to the private educational institutions it creates an agency to fulfill its obligation under the Constitution. The students are given admission to the educational institutions -whether state- owned or state-recognised - in recognition of their "right to education" under the Constitution. Charging capitation fee in consideration of admission to educational institutions, is a patent denial of a citizen's right to education under the Constitution"
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 330 - K Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next