Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.23 seconds)
Annie Gurmeher Kaur vs University Of Delhi & Anr. on 6 April, 2022 cites

Rajendrakumar Chandrakant Nadkarni vs University Of Bombay And Another on 5 September, 1990

In support of her plea, she places reliance on decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Deepa Vs. Maharishi Dayanand University & Ors. 2002 SCC OnLine P&H 1178, of the Rajasthan High Court in Fateh Kumari Sisodia Vs. State of Rajasthan 1997 SCC OnLine Raj 26, of the Bombay High Court in Rajendrakumar Chandrakant Nadkarni Vs. University of Bombay & Anr. 1990 SCC OnLine Bom 230 and of the Karnataka High Court in Ajay Bansal Vs. Bangalore University & Ors. 1989 SC OnLine Kar 388. In all these cases claims of students, who had emerged as toppers or highest scorers after revaluation were accepted.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Ms. Deepa vs Maharishi Dayanand University And Ors. on 20 December, 2002

14. I, may, now refer to the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:GARIMA MADAN W.P.(C) 2503/2021 Page 7 of 11 Signing Date:08.04.2022 17:25:40 Court in Deepa (Supra) wherein the Court has held a circular like the present to be arbitrary as it resulted meritorious students, who had been disadvantaged because of an error on the part of the examiner, being denied their due on account of a perceived distinction between original results and revaluated results. The relevant paragraph of the decision reads as under:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - S S Nijjar - Full Document

Fateh Kumari Sisodia vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 25 February, 1997

In support of her plea, she places reliance on decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Deepa Vs. Maharishi Dayanand University & Ors. 2002 SCC OnLine P&H 1178, of the Rajasthan High Court in Fateh Kumari Sisodia Vs. State of Rajasthan 1997 SCC OnLine Raj 26, of the Bombay High Court in Rajendrakumar Chandrakant Nadkarni Vs. University of Bombay & Anr. 1990 SCC OnLine Bom 230 and of the Karnataka High Court in Ajay Bansal Vs. Bangalore University & Ors. 1989 SC OnLine Kar 388. In all these cases claims of students, who had emerged as toppers or highest scorers after revaluation were accepted.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Kumar Saurabh vs University Of Delhi & Ors. on 7 December, 2015

9. Ms.Nehra, then places reliance on a decision in Kumar Saurabh Vs. University of Delhi 2015 SCC OnLine Del 13999 wherein this Court, dealing with the case of a student, who had emerged as the topper after taking into account the marks obtained by him/her in the improvement exams, observed that failure to accept the revised marks obtained upon re- evaluation, would lead to an absurd situation.
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - R Shakdher - Full Document
1