Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.23 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 96 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 97 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 83 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 87 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 60 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
State Of Bihar vs Radha Krishna Singh & Ors on 20 April, 1983
True that it
has presumptive value but it entails the presumption of
correctness. It is a rebutable evidence but otherside, questioning
the evidentiary value of these documentary evidence, has to
prove the same by leading credible rebuttal evidence. Exhibit-70
and 71 is prepared by responsible officer of the Government
while discharging his duty and as such they creates a fact in
issue and constituting relevant fact to decide the dispute
between the parties. Since these documents have statutory
flavour and prepared under the authority of the statute, they
have to be given weight (See State of Bihar vs. Radha Krishna
Singh and others - AIR 1983 SC 684) and therefore, they are
admissible in the evidence.
Martand Rao vs Malhar Rao on 24 November, 1927
In Martand Rao v. Malhar Rao, AIR 1928 P. C. 10,
their Lordships observed that official reports regarding
the nature of the estate are valuable and in many cases
the best evidence of facts stated therein, but opinion
therein expressed should not be treated as conclusive
in respect of matters requiring judicial determination,
however eminent the authors of such reports may be..."
Tarakdas Acharjee Choudhury vs The Secretary Of State For India In ... on 13 March, 1935
In case of Tarakdas Acharjee Choudhury vs. Secy. Of State - AIR
1935 Privy Council 125, the Hon'ble Privy Council held as
under :