Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)
Shankar Lal Jat vs Union Of India And Ors on 18 November, 2020 cites

K. Meghachandra Singh vs Ningam Siro on 19 November, 2019

7. We have similarly enquired from the counsel for the petitioner, how can the petitioner be given seniority above the 45th Batch when the petitioner admittedly did not participate or compete with the recruits of the 45th Batch. It has further been enquired, whether not the Rule of a person being not entitled to seniority from a date prior to being born in the cadre, as held in K. Meghachandra Singh Vs. Ningam Siro (2020) 5 SCC 689 would apply.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 40 - H Roy - Full Document

Arun Kumar Son Of Ram Sewak Yadav vs Union Of India Through Its Secretary To ... on 30 May, 2014

9. We have perused S.R. Arun Kumar supra and find that the petitioner therein undertook training with 44th (A) Batch and owing to absence not attributable to him, though should have been relegated to 44th (B) or (C) Batch, was allocated to the 45th Batch. Reasoning that since the respondents themself had relegated the petitioner therein to the 45th Batch even though could have relegated him from training with the 44th (B) or (C) batch, they could not affect his seniority, the petition was allowed.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1