Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.32 seconds)Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
G.V. Rao vs L.H.V. Prasad & Ors on 6 March, 2000
21. It would be relevant at this stage to take note of
an apt observation of this Court recorded G.V. Rao
vs. L.H.V. Prasad (2000) 3 SCC 693 wherein also in
a matrimonial dispute, this Court had held that the
11
M.Cr.C.No.18814/2019
High Court should have quashed the complaint
arising out of matrimonial dispute wherein all
family members had been roped into the
matrimonial litigation which was quashed and set
aside. Their Lordships observed therein with which
we entirely agree that:
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs K.M.Sharan on 21 February, 2008
In the case of C.B.I Vs. K.M. Sharan,
(2008) 4 SCC 471wherein the Apex Court has held
that the High Court in its jurisdiction under Section
482 Cr.P.C is not called upon to embark upon the
inquiry whether the allegations in the F.I.R and the
charge sheet are reliable or not and thereupon to
render definite finding about truthfulness or
veracity of the allegations. These are the matters
which can be examined only by the Court concerned
after the entire material is produced before it on a
thorough investigation and evidence is led.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Rakhi Mishra vs The State Of Bihar on 24 August, 2017
8. The Apex Court in the case of Rakhi Mishra Vs.
State of Bihar and others reported in AIR 2017 S.C. 4019
has held as under:-