Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.32 seconds)R.Lokesh Kannan vs The District Collector on 21 June, 2017
In view of the above facts, this
writ petition is disposed of directing the
petitioner to submit a fresh application to
the second respondent enclosing this order
copy and the orders passed in the writ
petition referred above, within a period of
two weeks from the date of receipt of the
copy of this order. On such receipt, the
second respondent shall consider the
petitioner's application and pass orders on
merits and in accordance with law, in the
light of the orders passed by this Court as
stated supra within a period of six weeks
thereafter.””
V.Devan vs The Tahsildar on 22 December, 2020
10.In yet another case of similar nature, this Court passed an order in
W.P.No.15403 of 2020 (V.Devan Vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the
Tahsildar, Chennai) dated 22.12.2020, wherein, particularly, in paragraph
No.7, it held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal
heirship certificate of late Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that
he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the
several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to
issue legal heir certificate for the Class II legal heirs also, the second
12/16
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.21230 of 2021
respondent has chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and
has rejected the request made by the petitioner herein, for issuance of Class
II legal heir certificate.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 8 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
M.S.O.S.P.V. Velayudam Chettiar And ... vs The Special Tahsildar For Land ... on 8 December, 1958
"(i) In M.Arumugam & Others vs.
The Tahsildar, Madurai South, Madurai and
4/16
http://www.judis.nic.in
W.P.No.21230 of 2021
another reported in CDJ 2013 MHC 6017,
it has been held as follows:-
The Registration Of Births And Deaths Act, 1969
1