Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.25 seconds)Section 15 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Article 243R in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 22 in West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
Polestar Electronic(P) Ltd vs Addl. Commissioner, Sales Tax Delhi on 20 February, 1978
The above settled proposition has been repeated and reiterated time
and again by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Reliance may be made to the
decision of M/s. Polestar Electronic (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. Additional Commissioner,
Sales Tax & Anr. reported in (1978) 1 SCC 636 and the relevant portions of
the above decision are quoted below:-
Punjab National Bank vs R.L. Vaid And Ors on 20 August, 2004
"5. We find that the High Court has merely
referred to the decision in R.K. Jain case without
even indicating as to applicability of the said
decision and as to how it has any relevance to
the facts of the case. It would have been proper
for the High Court to indicate the reasons and
also to spell out clearly as to the applicability of
the decision to the facts of the case. There is
always peril in treating the words of a judgment
as though they are words in a legislative
enactment and it is to be remembered that
judicial utterances are made in the setting of the
facts of a particular case. Circumstantial
flexibility, one additional or different fact may
make a difference between conclusions in two
cases. Disposal of cases by merely placing
reliance on a decision is not proper. Precedent
should be followed only so far at it marks the
path of justice, but you must cut out the dead
wood and trim off the side branches else you will
find yourself lost in thickets and branches, said
Lord Denning, while speaking in the matter of
applying precedents. The impugned order is
certainly vague."