Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.75 seconds)Pratap Chandra Mohanty vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 22 April, 1971
36. The Ld. ADJ01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap
Singh v. Union of India & Anr. has relied upon one another
judgment as Seema Grover v. Government of NCT of Delhi,
writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein
Page No.21 of 24
LAC Nos.13/1/08/06, 28/1/08/06, 19/1/08/06, 18/1/08/06 & 16/1/08/08
the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the
registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was
notified on 18.07.2007 was proper as such mode of valuation
was not unknown.
Subhash Batra vs Union Of India & Anr. on 19 December, 2014
In this respect, I am relying upon the judgment of Ld.
ADJ01, North East, KKD, Delhi passed in the year 2014 in
LAC No.1/2009 titled as Chandra Pratap Singh v. Union of
India & Anr. of the area of Jhilmil Tahirpur, another
judgment of which area has been upheld by the Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi vide judgment dated 19.12.2014 titled as
Subhash Batra v. Union of India and the method of
calculating the valuation of the land on the basis of circle
rates has been upheld.
Lal Chand vs Union Of India & Anr on 12 August, 2009
(4) Kapil Mehra (Major General) & Ors. v. Union of India &
Another
(5) Lal Chand v. Union of India
(6) Madishetti v. LAO
(7) Judgment dated 24.05.2014 passed by ADJ Karkardooma
Court
(8) Subhash Batra v. Union of India and Another
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Pramod Gupta (D) By L.Rs. And Ors. on 7 September, 2005
In support of his contention, ld. counsel for the
respondent no.1 has relied upon following judgments, as
under :
(1) UOI v. Pramod Gupta 2005(12) SCC 1
(2) ONGC Ltd. v. Sendhabhai Vastram Patel & Ors. 2005 (6)
SCC 454
(3) R P SIngh v. UOI 2005 (7) SCC 24
(4) Gafar & Ors. v. Moradabad Development Authority 2007 (7)
Page No.16 of 24
LAC Nos.13/1/08/06, 28/1/08/06, 19/1/08/06, 18/1/08/06 & 16/1/08/08
SCC 614
(5) Ranvir Singh & Ors. v. UOI 2005 (12) SCC 59
(6) UP Jal Nigam v. M/s. Kalra Properties Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1996
SC 1170
(7) Land Acquisition Officer v. Morisetty Satyanarayana 2002
(10) SCC 570
(8) Printers House Pvt. Ltd. v. Cold Storage & Food Products &
Ors. 1994 (2) SCC 134
(9) Topandas Kundamal v. State 1995 (5) SCC 336
(10) Shakuntala Bai & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra 1996 (2)
SCC 152
(11) Kanwar Singh & Ors. v. UOI 1998 (8) SCC 136
(12) M B Gopal Krishna & Ors. v. The Special Duty Collector
AIR 1996 SC 3149
(13) Lal Chand v. UOI 163 (2009) DLT 299 (SC)
(14) Bule v. UOI 170 (2010) DLT 371
(15) Revenue Division Officer, Kurnool District v. M.
Ramakrishna Reddy (D) by LRs (2011) SCC 648
Major General Kapil Mehra And Ors. vs Union Of India And Anr. on 24 December, 2010
(4) Kapil Mehra (Major General) & Ors. v. Union of India &
Another
(5) Lal Chand v. Union of India
(6) Madishetti v. LAO
(7) Judgment dated 24.05.2014 passed by ADJ Karkardooma
Court
(8) Subhash Batra v. Union of India and Another
Om Prakash vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 21 April, 2010
In support of his contention, Ld. counsel for the petitioners
has relied upon following judgments, as under :
(1) Om Prakash v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Satish And Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 16 July, 2009
Seema Grover Seth vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 8 November, 2011
36. The Ld. ADJ01 in the judgment titled as Chandra Pratap
Singh v. Union of India & Anr. has relied upon one another
judgment as Seema Grover v. Government of NCT of Delhi,
writ petition (C) 13122/09 decided on 08.11.2011, wherein
Page No.21 of 24
LAC Nos.13/1/08/06, 28/1/08/06, 19/1/08/06, 18/1/08/06 & 16/1/08/08
the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had held that act of the
registry in dealing the reduction in 20% per year, which was
notified on 18.07.2007 was proper as such mode of valuation
was not unknown.