Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.28 seconds)

Granite Services International India ... vs Dcit, New Delhi on 19 June, 2018

In view of the above decision and discussion, we are of the considered view that rendering of services by Rosamond Freeman- Attwood during the material period will be covered by "Independent Personal Services" as it is similar to the nature of services mentioned therein. These services as referred in Article 14 of India Srilanka Tax Treaty and Article 16 of India Kenya Tax Treaty are those in which out of special field of knowledge and learning a person develops an expertise to which he adds her/his exclusivity and thus becomes eligible to convert special knowledge into a special services. Thus, there is sufficient justification to accept the services availed by the assessee to be from 24 ITA No.2844/Del/2019 Independent Personal Services. Then assessee has submitted a copy of declaration dated 20.07.2012 made by Rosamond Freeman Attwood as appearing at page no. 114 of the paper book declaring that stay in India during the relevant financial year did not exist the threshold of 120 days. Further, in case of India Sri Lanka DTAA there was no provision for taxing the "Fees for Technical Services" during the said period and since a non-resident had no PE in India, the payment could not be taxable in India.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 28 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

S. A. Builders Ltd. .. Petitioner vs Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) ... on 14 December, 2006

7. We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. The Ld. CIT(A) deviated from its predecessor dated 13.10.2016 order for AY 2012-13 on the ground that FFC had reported profits in the current year. However, the Hon'ble Apex court in the case of S.A. Builders Ltd. vs CIT 288 ITR 1 has defined commercial expediency as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 1104 - M Katju - Full Document

Susanto Purnamo, , Ahmedabad vs Assessee on 4 August, 2016

On the other hand, in the case of Susanto Purnamo vs ITO [2016] taxmann.com 108, the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal Ahmeadad, quoting the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Kolkata Tribunal in the case of Graphite India Ltd Vs DCIT [(2002) 86 ITD 384 (Kol)] held that the specific professions set out in Article 15 of the Indo US Tax Treaty relating to "Independent Personal Services" which is similar worded as Article 14 of India Srilanka Tax Treaty and Article 16 of India Kenya Tax Treaty held that a specific professions set out therein are only illustrative and not exhaustive. The relevant discussion in para no.7 and 8 are read as under:-
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next