cites: 99681233

The Bombay Union Of Journalists And ... vs The, Hindu', Bombay, And Another on 27 September, 1961

22. From the above, it is very clear that the reliance sought to be placed by the appellant on the decision rendered by the Apex Court in Bombay Union of Journalists' case is quite wrong and misconceived. The said decision was rendered mainly on the basis of the factual position with reference to a resolution stated as taken by the concerned Union, genuineness of which was held against the Union. That apart, one of the two W.A.No.265 OF 2015 25 Judges who rendered the decision in Bombay Union of journalists case (His Lordship Justice K.N. Wanchoo) was also a member of the Larger Bench (Four Judges) who explained the scope of the former judgment in the subsequent decision reported in 1965 (I) LLJ 668 (cited supra). In the aboveircumstances, this Court finds that the challenge raised by the appellant with reference to nature of the dispute, is not liable to be sustained and the same stands repelled.

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 331 - J C Shah - Full Document

Section 73 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 70

Gouri Sankar Chatterjee & Ors vs Texmaco Limited & Ors on 15 December, 2000

[(2005) 1 SCC 639] and in Gouri Sankar Chatterjee and others vs. Texmaco Ltd. and others [(2001)2 SCC 257]in support of the contention that the terms of reference can't be widened by the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal.

Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 13 - S R Babu - Full Document

Workmen Of M/S Dharampal ... vs M/S. Dharampal Premchand (Saughandhi) on 16 March, 1965

20. There is no dispute that power of the Labour Court and Industrial Tribunal to deal with the matter is only subject to the existence of an 'industrial dispute' as defined under Section 2 (k) and not any individual dispute, unless it is caused to be raised by a union or supported by substantial number of workers. The verdict sought to be relied on from the part of the appellant as reported in 1961(II) LLJ 436 = AIR 1963 SC 318 (cited W.A.No.265 OF 2015 20 supra) was subsequently considered by a Larger Bench of the Apex Court (consisting of 4 Judges) and stands explained in Workman of Dharampal Premchand Vs. Dharmapal Premchand reported in 1965 (I) LLJ 668. The evolution of law, Scheme of the Statute and the circumstances/requirements to be satisfied to constitute an industrial dispute and the scope of reference were explained in detail in the aforesaid judgment authored by His Lordship Gajendragadkar J., on behalf of the Bench. One of the learned Judges who rendered the judgment in AIR 1963 SC 318 (cited supra) was also a member of the Larger Bench.

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 27 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document