Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.51 seconds)Section 4 in The Official Secrets Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Official Secrets Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Official Secrets Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
C.B.I.New Delhi vs Abhishek Verma on 6 May, 2009
In support of his arguments, the learned counsel for the
petitioner has referred to the principles of law laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in the case of "C.B.I. New Delhi v. Abhishek
Verma" AIR Supreme Court 2399, wherein it has been observed that the
presumption enshrined under Section 3(2) of the Official Secrets Act is a
rebutable presumption.
Aniruddha Bahal vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 26 May, 2014
11. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also referred to the
principles of law laid down by the Delhi High Court in the case of
"Aniruddha Bahal, Niraj Kumar and Thomas Mathew v. Central Bureau of
Investigation" 2014(16) RCR (Criminal) 1092, wherein it has been observed
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ
2026.03.09 20:06
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Criminal Misc. No. M-68099 of 2025 5
that with regard to commission of offence punishable under the Official
Secrets Act, the trial would be governed by the procedure laid down under
the Official Secrets Act.
The State vs Captain Jagjit Singh on 14 September, 1961
22. With regard to bail to an accused facing prosecution for the
commission of offence under the Official Secrets Act, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India in the case of "State v. Captain Jagjit Singh" AIR1962
Supreme Court 253 has observed that in view of nature of offence allegedly
committed by the accused, who were charged with an offence for conspirary
and offence under Sections 3 and 5 of the Official Secrets Act the accused is
not entitled for the bail. In the above-mentioned case the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India set-aside the order passed by the High Court, whereby the
benefit of bail was accorded to the respondent/accused.
Ramakant Dixit vs The State Of Telangana And Another on 22 February, 2022
12. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the
principles laid down by the Telangana High Court in the case of "Ramakant
Dixit v. State of Telangana and Another" 2023 Supreme(Online)(TEL)
1123, wherein it has been observed that under Section 13(3) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, the courts are restrained from taking cognizance
unless a complaint is made by order or under any authority from the
appropriate government, and that the complaint excludes police reports as
per Section 2(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
1