Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.94 seconds)Section 18 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971
United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Sh. Satya Nand And Others on 31 July, 2015
6.8.2 In Institute of chartered accountant of India V. Shahunak H. Satya and
ors., [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7571 of 2011] the Supreme Court laid down the following
observations:
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
6.8.3 In Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr. v. Aditya Bandopadhyay
& Ors. [2011 (8) SCALE 645] the Supreme Court laid down the following observations:
Shri A.K. Singh vs Shri M.S. Upadhye, Cpio, Addl. ... on 11 July, 2006
6.8.6 Right to information only to citizen of India
The Right to Information Act gives right to information only to citizen of India. It does
not make provision for giving information to companies, associations, corporations etc.
However, if an application is made by an employee of any corporation, association,
company, NGO indicating his name and such employee/officer bearer is a citizen of India
then in that case it would presume that a citizen has sought information and the
information may be supplied to him/her.
Poorna Prajna Public School vs Central Information Commission & ... on 25 September, 2009
6.8.8 In case of Poorna Prajna High School V. Central Information
Commission it was held that it is mandatory for public authorities to disseminate
information that is accessible to them. As a result, information that a public body has
access to is deemed information under Section 2(f) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
Here public authority is referred to as the framework or the body under which the
institution is governed.
Reserve Bank Of India vs Jayantilal N. Mistry on 16 December, 2015
6.8.9 In case of Reserve Bank of India V. Jayantilal Mistry the Court briefly
analysed section 2(f) of the RTI Act, which defines information to include "...
information relating to any private body which can accessed by a public authority under
any other law for the time being in force." Using this inclusive definition, the Court
Page 21 of 25
held that, even if a fiduciary relationship existed between the RBI and other banks,
section 2(f) would render them accessible to the public."