Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.36 seconds)Ganpat Ladha vs Sashikant Vishnu Shinde on 21 February, 1978
14. It may in this entire context not be out of place to invite attention to the observation of the Supreme Court in the case of Ganpat Ladha v. Sashikant Vishnu Shinde, :
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mranalini B. Shah And Anr. vs Bapalal Mohanlal Shah on 1 May, 1978
This provision has been once again reiterated by the Supreme Court in Mranalini B. Shah v. Bapalal Mohanlal Shah, A.I.R. 1960 Supreme Court 954.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 11 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Firm Of Harbanslal Jagmohandas & Anr vs Prabhudas Shivlal on 16 April, 1971
The said view, however, has been expressly overruled by the Supreme Court in Harbanslal v. Prabhudas, , holding thus :
The Delhi Rent Act, 1995
Shah Dhansukhlal Chhaganlal vs Dalichand Virchand Shroff And Others on 1 March, 1968
6. Indeed, even in an earlier case viz. Dhansukhlal Chhaganlal v. Dalichand Virchand, , the Supreme Court held thus :
Ratilal Balabhai Nazar vs Ranchhodbhai Shankarbhai Patel And ... on 23 August, 1965
"....... Thus section 12(3)(a) of the Act makes it obligatory for the Court to pass a decree when its conditions are satisfied as was pointed out by one of us (Bhagwati, J.) in Ratilal Balabhai Nazar v. Ranchodbhai Shankarbhai Patel, A.I.R. 1976 Gujarat 172. If there is statutory default or neglect on the part of the tenant, whatever may be its cause, the landlord acquires a right under section 12(3)(a) to get a decree for eviction".
1