record, an objection came to be filed by contesting opposite parties claiming their rights as bhumidhars on the premises that the property in question being ... devolved upon them as successors. On the other hand, the petitioner repudiated their claims and claimed that his name was rightly entered in the basic
lodged a false complaint on petty grounds, as the applicants were repudiating his claim that he had already paid Rs. 1,300/-. Also the liability
aforestated suit. In the written statement, the defendant repudiated the plaintiff's case claiming that the house in question was acquired exclusively
Claim No. 47/98/24) under Fishery Policy No. 4742010200244, A/c. Shri Tausiful Hassan. This claim was initially repudiated by Kanpur ... favourable legal opinion from Advocate, Shri Gopi Shyam Nigam, and settled the claim of Rs. 1,18,000/- thereby caused wrongful loss of equivalent amount
Thereafter, defendant No. 1 entered appearance and filed written statement repudiating plaint allegations and claiming his own rights and ownership in the property. In paragraph
claiming himself to be the exclusive Bhumidhar of the land in question on the basis of a Will dated 13-5-1979 which ... parties repudiated the plaint allegations and denied exclusive rights as Bhumidhar of the plaintiff over the property in question and claimed 1/3rd share each
repudiation of a contract of service by his master and say that, the contract has never been terminated. Remedy to the employee is a claim
that the contesting Opp. parties have been wrongfully deprived of right being claimed through Raja Ram nor has he been able to fish out anything ... anywhere near rendering the finding perverted. It is borne out without repudiation that after dismissal Of the appeal in the year 1992, no restoration application
Suit No. 70 of 1958) and, according to the suit, the landlord claimed vacant possession and also the rent @ Rs. 2,500 p.m. till ... This compromise decree was, however, repudiated by the tenant, i.e., the legal representatives of Shri Sukh Nandan Prasad Varma on the ground that
disclaimer is done not with this object but with an express repudiation of the tenancy under the landlord it would operate as forfeiture ... accommodation fell into share of the plaintiff and thereafter that only plaintiff claimed rent, therefore, denial of the title by the defendants cannot be said
