2. He submitted that after the death
of husband of defendant No.2, she and her children were no
longer Class I legal heirs along ... that
since the defendant No.2 and her legal heirs are not Class I
heirs, the plaintiffs cannot invoke Section 22 of the Act.
Alternatively
heirs, being the relatives specified in class I of the Schedule;
(b) secondly, if there is no heir of class I, then upon the heirs ... every other respect.
THE SCHEDULE
(See Section 8 )
HEIRS IN CLASS I AND CLASS II
Class I
Son; daughter; widow; mother
heirs, being the relatives specified in class I of the Schedule;
(b) secondly, if there is no heir of class 1, then upon the heirs ... every other respect.
The Schedule
(See Section 8 )
HEIRS IN CLASS I AND CLASS II
Class I
Son; daughter; widow; mother
item number 2 of
Entry 2 in Class II has been elevated as a Class I heir under the
amendment. However, son's daughter ... Entry 2 under class II in the Schedule.
6. REVISION OF CLASS-I HEIRS
Class I heirs in the Schedule contain a large list
deceased Basavaraj V Hiremath along
with the defendant No.2 and 4 as class-I heir, further
to declare that the legal heirship issued ... Therefore,
the defendant No.4, plaintiff No.1 & 2 are the Class-I
leal heirs of the Basavaraj V. Hiremath . Therefore,
they are entitled
deceased Basavaraj V Hiremath along
with the defendant No.2 and 4 as class-I heir, further
to declare that the legal heirship issued ... Therefore,
the defendant No.4, plaintiff No.1 & 2 are the Class-I
leal heirs of the Basavaraj V. Hiremath . Therefore,
they are entitled
leaving
behind the plaintiffs and defendants being his Class-I heirs.
Sri.Annamalai and defendants 2 & 3 were engaged in mason
work, having sufficient ... 2012
Sri.Annamalai, his wife and 2 sons being Class I heirs
already succeeded suit Item No.1 property. Therefore, even
if they contended
deceased and
therefore, impleaded as respondent no. 2. Respondent no. 2
is not a class-I legal heir of the deceased. Being a nominee ... Class-I legal heir rather brother of
the deceased would fall within Class-II legal heir. Despite
being a Class-II legal heir, respondent
upon any of the defendants including defendants no.1 & 2, the
Class-II heirs; that the defendants no.3 & 4, being nephew ... defendants. He
further deposed that the defendants no.1 and 2 are Class-II heirs and
defendants no.3 and 4 are nephew and brother
such scenario the
plaintiff No.2 to 4 are only the legal heirs being the legal heirs as
per class II of Hindu Succession ... material on record shows that at best
plaintiff No.2 to 4 are class 2 heirs of deceased Satpal and status
fo all the class
