Sankara Narayanan ... 1st Respondent in
CMA.1413/2008
S.Viswanathan ... 1st Respondent in
CMA.1414/2008
S.Nagarajan ... 1st Respondent in
CMA.1415/2008
Minor ... Akkshaya,
rep. by father & next friend
S.Nagarajan ... 1st Respondent in
CMA.1416/2008
C.Vijayam ... 1st Respondent in
CMA.1417/2008
C.Mythili
2020 at 09:06:33 PM)
(2 of 14) [CMA-478/2020]
Jhunjhunu (Raj.)-333001
9. Shrishti Chodhary W/o. Shri Hanuman Sahai Barala,
Aged ... 2020 at 09:06:33 PM)
(3 of 14) [CMA-478/2020]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY CHATURVEDI
Judgment
31/08/2020
Notice upon
2020 at 08:54:01 PM)
(2 of 12) [CMA-3220/2018]
learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is finally
heard at this ... 2020 at 08:54:01 PM)
(3 of 12) [CMA-3220/2018]
on 26.11.16 on behalf of the respondent by her counsel
2019 at 11:24:15 PM)
(2 of 13) [CMA-3367/2017]
5. Smt. Parmeshwari Devi, Wife Of Shri ... 2019 at 11:24:15 PM)
(3 of 13) [CMA-3367/2017]
Natural Guardian Smt. Sahida Bano, Appellant No.6
----Appellants
Versus
1. Pawandeep Singh
2019 at 08:24:06 PM)
(2 of 12) [CMA-626/2002]
All the four appeals are arising out of the same judgment
rendered ... Singh driver under Sections 279 , 337 and 338 of IPC.
The first CMA No. 626/2002 is by Baksha Ram for
enhancement as well
Bench: Sangeet Lodha , Pushpendra Singh Bhati
(1 of 10) [CMA-2152/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal ... 2020 at 08:21:32 PM)
(2 of 10) [CMA-2152/2019]
"It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this
appeal may kindly
2019 at 11:51:45 PM)
(2 of 11) [CMA-1603/2019]
September, 2017 as per Hindu rites & rituals. Since marriage,
both the spouses ... 2019 at 11:51:45 PM)
(3 of 11) [CMA-1603/2019]
eschewed by the learned trial Court while passing the impugned
order, therefore, same
Section 151 CPC; of which the plaintiff-appellant is
(2 of 13 )
[CMA-15/2006]
aggrieved of.
2. Briefly, the essential skeletal material facts ... Learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant, reiterating the
(3 of 13 )
[CMA-15/2006]
pleaded facts and grounds of the memo of appeal, asserted that
Author: Vineet Kothari
Bench: Vineet Kothari
(1) CMA -42/96 - Mukh Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.(2)cma.296/96-Katar ... Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.(3)
CMA.292/96 -Tara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (4)CMA.453/96-Anop Singh Vs. State
2022 at 08:26:33 PM)
(2 of 78) [CMA-2160/2018]
----Appellant
Versus
1. LR's of Teja Ram S/o Shri Chotu ... 2022 at 08:26:33 PM)
(3 of 78) [CMA-2160/2018]
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur Raj.
4. Land Acquisition Officer, SDO, Nagaur (Raj.)
----Respondents
