2022 at 09:14:00 PM)
(2 of 5) [CMA-2648/2015]
of this Court in Malti (Smt.) and Ors. v. M.K. Vasu ... 2022 at 09:14:00 PM)
(3 of 5) [CMA-2648/2015]
(Supra) by this Court and the said judgment would be binding on
this
2022 at 09:15:30 PM)
(2 of 5) [CMA-5451/2008]
dated 31.05.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
(Fast Tract) Kotputali, District ... 2022 at 09:15:30 PM)
(3 of 5) [CMA-5451/2008]
case and affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National
Insurance
CMA-593/2000]
2. A limited point of challenge is that since the driver of the
offending Truck had no driving licence rather ... CMA-593/2000]
Company Limited Vs. Geeta Bhat & Ors. reported in 2008 ACJ
1498 and New India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Dyal
Singh
CMA-908/2006]
respondent no.1 and son of respondents no.2 & 3, in a motor
vehicle accident.
2. The case and claim ... CMA-908/2006]
compensation based on the material available on record, the
calculation of compensation requires to be made straight and
just. Thus, the payable
CMA-159/2003]
The Tribunal had made award of Rs.96,000/- against the claim of
Rs.36,72,000/-.
2. A brief facts ... CMA-159/2003]
accepted age of the deceased, multiplier of 15 should have been
applied, however, the learned Tribunal has awarded multiplier of
13. Nothing
CMA-4129/2011]
2. The owner and driver of the offending truck did not contest
the claim case, hence, the appellant took permission ... CMA-4129/2011]
the Tribunal should have not accepted income of the deceased as
claimed.
5. No one appears for the respondents, though, the
respondents
CMA-1212/2016]
on his behalf, service may be made on any adult
member of the family, whether male or female, who
is residing with ... CMA-1212/2016]
in Surat. However, no cross-examination was made to the
appellant regarding his actual place of residence at Surat.
7. Learned Court
2022 at 12:08:57 AM)
(2 of 5) [CMA-960/1997]
For Appellant(s) : Mr. O P Garg
Mr. Raj Kumar Sharma
For Respondent ... 2022 at 12:08:57 AM)
(3 of 5) [CMA-960/1997]
appeal, the Appellate Court may, if it thinks fit, by
order remand
2022 at 09:19:10 PM)
(2 of 4) [CMA-4360/2017]
3. The appellants are parents of Suresh Kumar. On 01.07.2012
Suresh Kumar ... 2022 at 09:19:10 PM)
(3 of 4) [CMA-4360/2017]
been of 18 but the Tribunal applied the multiplier of 13, though
2022 at 09:14:01 PM)
(2 of 4) [CMA-4279/2017]
By the impugned award dated 09.05.2017, the learned
Tribunal awarded ... 2022 at 09:14:01 PM)
(3 of 4) [CMA-4279/2017]
pedestal considering the prospect of deceased. The interest should
have been 12% instead
