2019 at 11:51:45 PM)
(2 of 11) [CMA-1603/2019]
September, 2017 as per Hindu rites & rituals. Since marriage,
both the spouses ... 2019 at 11:51:45 PM)
(3 of 11) [CMA-1603/2019]
eschewed by the learned trial Court while passing the impugned
order, therefore, same
2019 at 08:51:33 PM)
(2 of 7) [CMA-2825/2018]
On account of disputes and differences being developed, they
started living separately ... 2019 at 08:51:33 PM)
(3 of 7) [CMA-2825/2018]
prayer of the appellant for visitation rights has not been
considered
2019 at 01:38:28 AM)
(2 of 5) [CMA-2153/2019]
expenses. The petitioner has also questioned legality of order
dated 11.3.19, rejecting ... 2019 at 01:38:28 AM)
(3 of 5) [CMA-2153/2019]
5. The application was contested by the appellant by filing a
reply thereto
2019 at 12:43:00 AM)
(2 of 3) [CMA-2089/2019]
therefore, the Family Court has erred in awarding maintenance
pendente lite ... 2019 at 12:43:00 AM)
(3 of 3) [CMA-2089/2019]
Family Court as aforesaid, cannot be said to be excessive
2019 at 11:02:56 PM)
(2 of 3) [CMA-2163/2019]
limitation for filing the appeal being 30 days, when he contacted
his counsel ... 2019 at 11:02:56 PM)
(3 of 3) [CMA-2163/2019]
5. Though, the appellant has attempted to project that the
respondent is having
2019 at 01:02:37 AM)
(2 of 3) [CMA-979/2019]
2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that
the Family Court ... 2019 at 01:02:37 AM)
(3 of 3) [CMA-979/2019]
determined by the Family Court as aforesaid, cannot be said to be
excessive
2019 at 11:44:35 PM)
(2 of 2) [CMA-2974/2018]
Accordingly, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation
Act is allowed. Delay
2019 at 11:58:01 PM)
(2 of 2) [CMA-736/2018]
List the matter before the Mediator on 19.9.19
The parties shall remain present
2019 at 01:38:11 AM)
(2 of 2) [CMA-4/2019]
amount of maintenance payable in terms of the order impugned,
shall remain stayed
