this common order.
MVR,J
CRP Nos.94,420 & CMA Nos.7,229 of 2019
2
5. The parties as arrayed in the suit ... executed a sale
MVR,J
CRP Nos.94,420 & CMA Nos.7,229 of 2019
3
deed in respect of 605 sq.yards
this common order.
MVR,J
CRP Nos.94,420 & CMA Nos.7,229 of 2019
2
5. The parties as arrayed in the suit ... executed a sale
MVR,J
CRP Nos.94,420 & CMA Nos.7,229 of 2019
3
deed in respect of 605 sq.yards
this common order.
MVR,J
CRP Nos.94,420 & CMA Nos.7,229 of 2019
2
5. The parties as arrayed in the suit ... executed a sale
MVR,J
CRP Nos.94,420 & CMA Nos.7,229 of 2019
3
deed in respect of 605 sq.yards
this common order.
MVR,J
CRP Nos.94,420 & CMA Nos.7,229 of 2019
2
5. The parties as arrayed in the suit ... executed a sale
MVR,J
CRP Nos.94,420 & CMA Nos.7,229 of 2019
3
deed in respect of 605 sq.yards
Tangutur. When it was on the bypass road after crossing
MVR,J
CMA No.735 OF 2005
2
Tangutur, the deceased Ramakrishna who was sitting ... Commissioner and whereas the 2nd respondent filed a detailed
MVR,J
CMA No.735 OF 2005
3
written statement denying the entire case
further averred in the plaint that though the first respondent
MVR,J
CMA No.672/2015 & CRP No.4453/2015
2
demanded his brothers ... arrangement orally, whereby the suit house was agreed to be
MVR,J
CMA No.672/2015 & CRP No.4453/2015
3
shared among
further averred in the plaint that though the first respondent
MVR,J
CMA No.672/2015 & CRP No.4453/2015
2
demanded his brothers ... arrangement orally, whereby the suit house was agreed to be
MVR,J
CMA No.672/2015 & CRP No.4453/2015
3
shared among
learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. None represented
the 1st respondent.
2. CMA No.975 of 2017 is directed against the order ... whereas CMA No.976 of 2017 is directed
against the order
learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. None represented
the 1st respondent.
2. CMA No.975 of 2017 is directed against the order ... whereas CMA No.976 of 2017 is directed
against the order
Author: M. Venkata Ramana
Bench: M. Venkata Ramana
1
MVR,J
CMA_869_2008
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. VENKATA RAMANA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL ... Main Road, the alleged accident occurred on account of
2
MVR,J
CMA_869_2008
rash and negligent driving by the driver of the lorry
