CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2981 OF 2011
ORDER:
The first respondent in CMA No.5 of 2010 on the file of
Senior Civil Judge, Siricilla ... Constitution of India challenging the Order dated 08.04.2011 in
CMA No.5 of 2010, whereby the learned Senior Civil Judge allowed
the CMA while setting
common order.
5. In OP No.529 of 1991 against which CMA No.191 of 1996 is filed, the Tribunal has assessed the compensation with ... against which CMA No. 187 of 1996 arise the Tribunal on appreciation of evidence awarded a compensation of Rs.6,000/- towards injuries sustained
office asked the counsel for the appellants to convert the CMA into CRP. For taking this objection and for urging the counsel to convert ... CMA into revision the office relied upon the decision of a Bench of this Court in CMA No.612 of 1977 dated
lyengar, JJ., in Muthuvaien's case. In that case also a CMA was preferred to the High Court against the order of the learned ... held that a Letters Patent Appeal lay against a judgment in a CMA disposed of by a single Judge of the High Court
ARBLR30(AP)
JUDGMENT
T. Meena Kumari, J.
1. The present CMA has been directed aggrieved by the orders of the II Additional Chief Judge ... brief facts that led to the filing of the present CMA are as follows:
It is stated by the appellant that pursuant to the policy
Suit.
3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present CMA are as follows :
The appellant is doing business in regulating and transmitting ... month and the disputed period in this CMA is from 29-6-2002 i.e., the date of agreement. Though there is a default
Judge, Hyderabad East and North, Ranga Reddy District, the respondents herein filed CMA No. 16 of 2002 before the II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy ... Additional District Judge by an order dated 14.3.2002 has allowed the CMA by setting aside the order in I.A. dated 21.12.2001. Questioning the said
dismissed by the trial Court on 15.07.2010.
Aggrieved thereby, he filed CMA No.26 of 2010 before the Family Court-cum-Court
of the learned ... sought
interim relief in IA No.798 of 2010 filed in the CMA. The said IA was dismissed
by the appellate Court on 23.12.2010. However
fault basis.
5. The claimants in OP 384 of 1988 have preferred CMA 324 of 1992 for enhancement of compensation and for making the Insurance ... entire amount of compensation, while the Insurance Company has preferred CMA 1553 of 1992 challenging the order of the learned Tribunal whereby it has held
Arbitration Act referring the dispute to a single arbitrator and CMA No. 882 of 1992 arises out of the order dated ... adduce any documentary evidence. By its order under appeal is CMA No. 3 of 1990, the trial Court while directing the defendants to file