2021 at 05:11:55 PM)
(2 of 12) [CMA-177/2008]
Balapura from Bhilwara side, and at that time, was hit by a truck ... 2021 at 05:11:55 PM)
(3 of 12) [CMA-177/2008]
entitlement. Firstly, the liability of the person who is liable
and the person
2020 at 08:50:56 PM)
(2 of 28) [CMA-878/2012]
4. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through Branch Manager,
Branch Office Fort Road ... 2020 at 08:50:56 PM)
(3 of 28) [CMA-878/2012]
appellant insurance company submitted that while the accident
had happened
2019 at 11:50:22 PM)
(2 of 16) [CMA-2008/2012]
16/17.3.2007 in Car No. RJ24-C-2121. A Trolla bearing ... 2019 at 11:50:22 PM)
(3 of 16) [CMA-2008/2012]
was apparent. The learned Tribunal has also discussed the
evidence of the driver
Ranjeet Singh, Hari Singh, Shaitan Singh,
Vikram Singh and Chunni Devi.
2. CMA No.2318/2007 has been filed by claimants on
account of death ... Himmat Singh, CMA No.1014/2009 has been
filed by claimant Chunni Devi for the injuries suffered by her, CMA
No.2313/2012 has been
Ranjeet Singh, Hari Singh, Shaitan Singh,
Vikram Singh and Chunni Devi.
2. CMA No.2318/2007 has been filed by claimants on
account of death ... Himmat Singh, CMA No.1014/2009 has been
filed by claimant Chunni Devi for the injuries suffered by her, CMA
No.2313/2012 has been
Ranjeet Singh, Hari Singh, Shaitan Singh,
Vikram Singh and Chunni Devi.
2. CMA No.2318/2007 has been filed by claimants on
account of death ... Himmat Singh, CMA No.1014/2009 has been
filed by claimant Chunni Devi for the injuries suffered by her, CMA
No.2313/2012 has been
Ranjeet Singh, Hari Singh, Shaitan Singh,
Vikram Singh and Chunni Devi.
2. CMA No.2318/2007 has been filed by claimants on
account of death ... Himmat Singh, CMA No.1014/2009 has been
filed by claimant Chunni Devi for the injuries suffered by her, CMA
No.2313/2012 has been
have been preferred by the appellants claiming
the following reliefs:
CMA No.1526/2004:
"1. That the appeal may kindly be allowed ... 2019 at 08:35:27 PM)
(2 of 4) [CMA-1526/2004]
CMA No.1525/2004:
"1. That the appeal may kindly be allowed
have been preferred by the appellants claiming
the following reliefs:
CMA No.1526/2004:
"1. That the appeal may kindly be allowed ... 2019 at 08:35:26 PM)
(2 of 4) [CMA-1526/2004]
CMA No.1525/2004:
"1. That the appeal may kindly be allowed
2021 at 02:12:59 PM)
(2 of 7) [CMA-243/2000]
the respondents have not been able to refute the income in
question ... 2021 at 02:12:59 PM)
(3 of 7) [CMA-243/2000]
assess the income at Rs.5000/- per month. Adding 40% for
future prospects
