2021 at 08:45:19 PM)
(2 of 14) [CMA-581/2021 ... 2021 at 08:45:19 PM)
(3 of 14) [CMA-581/2021]
Based on the above averments, it was prayed that
possession of the land
operative Tribunal, Jaipur ('the Tribunal') on
13.1.2009.
(3 of 6)
[CMA-346/2017]
As the Tribunal was not constituted a writ petition against ... filed and no bonafide reason has been indicated for
(4 of 6)
[CMA-346/2017]
seeking condonation of delay. It is submitted that the finding
2021 at 08:49:37 PM)
(2 of 4) [CMA-1242/2020]
The Commercial Court after hearing the parties came to the
conclusion that under ... 2021 at 08:49:37 PM)
(3 of 4) [CMA-1242/2020]
of the award passed by the Arbitrator, which was ex-facie contrary
August, 2021
Author: Arun Bhansali
Bench: Arun Bhansali
(1 of 3) [CMA-2112/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil ... 2021 at 09:01:24 PM)
(2 of 3) [CMA-2112/2019]
Notice of application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
was issued
Additional District Judge, Anupgarh ('the trial court'),
(2 of 5)
[CMA-2132/2017]
whereby, the application filed by the appellant under Order XXII ... Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of
(3 of 5)
[CMA-2132/2017]
delay, has been filed and no reasons have been indicated
Commissioner by his award dated 24.07.2012 accepted
(2 of 4)
[CMA-1855/2017]
the claim.
The appellant filed a review petition, which came ... appellant and have perused the material available on
record.
(3 of 4)
[CMA-1855/2017]
The facts, as noticed hereinbefore, are not in dispute
whereby
filed was 90 days from the date of
(2 of 3)
[CMA-2050/2017]
receipt of the award and further delay of only 30 days ... award itself that the parties were given
(3 of 3)
[CMA-2050/2017]
certified copy free of cost on 16.05.2016. Further in the
application filed
