behalf of
Mr. B.R. Vashisth, Adv.
_____________________________________________________
(2 of 14)
[ CMA-232/2017]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI
Date of Judgment ... awards dated 08/09/2014, have
been dismissed.
The brief facts of CMA No.232/2017 are that the appellant
No.1 availed loan facility
tender
proceedings besides other competitors and on winning the
(2 of 6)
[CMA-1119/2015]
contract, tender was awarded in his favour for construction ... Contractor vide award dated 09.10.2008 in the
(3 of 6)
[CMA-1119/2015]
following manner ;
"In the result, the claimant succeeds and the claimant
Judgment and Decree dated 16.12.2016 made in Cooperative Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (CMA) No.24 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash ... Challenging the aforesaid surcharge order, the third respondent preferred an appeal in CMA.No.32 of 1996. The aforesaid appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal
unfiled CMA on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode.
For Petitioner
:
Mr.N.Manokaran
For Respondents
:
No Appearance
ORDER
This revision is directed ... declining to condone the delay of 1300 days in filing the CMA.
2. The petitioner is the appellant in an un-numbered CMA filed
operative Tribunal, Jaipur ('the Tribunal') on
13.1.2009.
(3 of 6)
[CMA-346/2017]
As the Tribunal was not constituted a writ petition against ... filed and no bonafide reason has been indicated for
(4 of 6)
[CMA-346/2017]
seeking condonation of delay. It is submitted that the finding
learned First Appellate Court for enabling it to
decide application being CMA No. 228-6 of 2004
instituted therebefore, by Mohi Ram under Section ... Reiteratedly, it shall
thereafter make a pronouncement upon the aforesaid
application bearing CMA No. 228-S/6 of 2004. In case on
the strength
learned First Appellate Court for enabling it to
decide application being CMA No. 228-6 of 2004
instituted therebefore, by Mohi Ram under Section ... Reiteratedly, it shall
thereafter make a pronouncement upon the aforesaid
application bearing CMA No. 228-S/6 of 2004. In case on
the strength
Additional District Judge, Anupgarh ('the trial court'),
(2 of 5)
[CMA-2132/2017]
whereby, the application filed by the appellant under Order XXII ... Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of
(3 of 5)
[CMA-2132/2017]
delay, has been filed and no reasons have been indicated
wife, the respondent Smt.Preeti Paliwal, with cruelty.
(2 of 5)
[CMA-656/2017]
Briefly stated, on 23.11.2010 the appellant and respondent
were married ... reasons as to why we should set
(3 of 5)
[CMA-656/2017]
aside the finding returned by the ld.Family Court regarding the
ground
Commissioner by his award dated 24.07.2012 accepted
(2 of 4)
[CMA-1855/2017]
the claim.
The appellant filed a review petition, which came ... appellant and have perused the material available on
record.
(3 of 4)
[CMA-1855/2017]
The facts, as noticed hereinbefore, are not in dispute
whereby
