2021 at 06:07:12 PM)
(2 of 19) [CMA-12/2019]
1. M/s Solcon Enginners Pvt. Ltd., having its registered office
at Plot ... 2021 at 06:07:12 PM)
(3 of 19) [CMA-12/2019]
would be competent to execute an arbitral award, on a "commercial
dispute
2022 at 09:35:31 PM)
(2 of 15) [CMA-1679/2019]
----Appellants
Versus
1. Mustkim S/o Bassir, Aged About 27 Years ... 2022 at 09:35:31 PM)
(3 of 15) [CMA-1679/2019]
same from owner and driver of the vehicle in question. The
claim petition
2020 at 09:06:33 PM)
(2 of 14) [CMA-478/2020]
Jhunjhunu (Raj.)-333001
9. Shrishti Chodhary W/o. Shri Hanuman Sahai Barala,
Aged ... 2020 at 09:06:33 PM)
(3 of 14) [CMA-478/2020]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY CHATURVEDI
Judgment
31/08/2020
Notice upon
Section 151 CPC; of which the plaintiff-appellant is
(2 of 13 )
[CMA-15/2006]
aggrieved of.
2. Briefly, the essential skeletal material facts ... Learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant, reiterating the
(3 of 13 )
[CMA-15/2006]
pleaded facts and grounds of the memo of appeal, asserted that
2003, whereby, the petition filed by the
(2 of 19)
[CMA-3990/2009]
applicant/appellant under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for
dissolution ... that appellant is the only male child of his
(3 of 19)
[CMA-3990/2009]
parents. Brother-in-law of non-applicant, Chhitar resides
cruelty and desertion. The respondent pleaded in his application
(2 of 14
[CMA 5188/2008]
that he was married to appellant-Smt. Geeta ... given beating and was turned out of
(3 of 14
[CMA 5188/2008]
matrimonial home.
The Court below on the basis of the pleadings framed
2019 at 09:45:12 PM)
(2 of 12) [CMA-871/2019]
from her first marriage. The appellant-husband was issueless from
his first marriage ... 2019 at 09:45:12 PM)
(3 of 12) [CMA-871/2019]
Heard learned counsel for the appellant-husband as also the
respondent-wife
2021 at 07:53:38 AM)
(2 of 14) [CMA-5291/2019]
plaintiff-respondent company is engaged in the business of
amongst other things extracting ... 2021 at 07:53:38 AM)
(3 of 14) [CMA-5291/2019]
that it is likely to create confusion in the mind of the customers
returned at 10.00 pm having met their sister for
(2 of 14)
[CMA-2347/2014]
which the Appellant had also lodged a report before ... Family Judge committed an error of record in holding
(3 of 14)
[CMA-2347/2014]
that no name of the female colleague had been mentioned
Family Court') in Matrimonial Case
(2 of 22)
[CMA-3485/2006]
No.117/2006, whereby the petition filed by the respondent-
husband under Section ... When the respondent-husband complained to her parents with
(3 of 22)
[CMA-3485/2006]
regard to her behavior, they simply said that the appellant
