July, 2009
Author: Vineet Kothari
Bench: Vineet Kothari
(1) CMA-113/2009 (State of Rajasthan Vs. M/s Gyan Chand Mehta & Anr.) (2) cma ... transportation cost in favour of the contractor beyond the rates
(1) CMA-113/2009 (State of Rajasthan Vs. M/s Gyan Chand Mehta
years, resident of Raila, Tehsil Baneda, District Bhilwara.
----Appellant
(2 of 41) [CMA-989/2007]
Versus
1. Union of India through Secretary, Government of India ... Sector 10,
Dwarka, New Delhi - 110 075.
----Respondents
(3 of 41) [CMA-989/2007]
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 986/2007
Premlal Samariya
2019 at 11:24:18 PM)
(2 of 13) [CMA-3367/2017]
5. Smt. Parmeshwari Devi, Wife Of Shri ... 2019 at 11:24:18 PM)
(3 of 13) [CMA-3367/2017]
Natural Guardian Smt. Sahida Bano, Appellant No.6
----Appellants
Versus
1. Pawandeep Singh
depicting 'Rani' was adopted by
(2 of 12)
[CMA-1286/2016]
the appellant in respect of the goods and he applied for trademark ... alleged that the overall resemblance between the
(3 of 12)
[CMA-1286/2016]
appellant-plaintiff's trademark/label and that of the respondent
Bheelon Ki Dhani,
Tehsil Udaipur Wati, District Jhunjhunu.
(2 of 15)
[ CMA-449/2001]
3. Ishab Khan s/o Shri Bholu Khan, b/c Khokhar ... Transport Corporation, through its Depot
Manager, Churu.
----Appellant
Versus
(3 of 15)
[ CMA-449/2001]
1. Smt. Sumitra Devi widow of late Shri Birbal Jangir
Author: Vineet Kothari
Bench: Vineet Kothari
CMA No.1603/09- UIT Bhilwara Vs. Durga Lal & 29 other connected appeals.
Judgment ... MISC. APPEAL NO.205/2010
U.I.T. Bhilwara Vs. Rameshwar Lal
CMA No.1603/09- UIT Bhilwara Vs. Durga Lal & 29 other connected
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
(for short, 'Act').
(2 of 21) [CMA-2493/2011]
2. Cause of grievance against the impugned judgment and
award ... jointly and severally from the respondents.
(3 of 21) [CMA-2493/2011]
4. The claim petition was contested by insurer respondent
No.3. Respondent Insurer
Sons & Anr.) and rejected the objections
raised therein.
(2 of 17) [CMA-2780/2016]
2. The facts, leading to the present misc. appeal ... before learned Court below. In its application, assailing
(3 of 17) [CMA-2780/2016]
the arbitral award on various grounds, Union of India craved
perpetual and mandatory
injunction, by a common order.
(2 of 21)
[ CMA-1097/2017]
2. Succinctly stated, the facts of case are that appellant-
plaintiff ... built up a handsome and valuable trade thereunder.
(3 of 21)
[ CMA-1097/2017]
3. Castigating the respondent-defendants for imitating its
trademark/label
2019 at 08:24:06 PM)
(2 of 12) [CMA-626/2002]
All the four appeals are arising out of the same judgment
rendered ... Singh driver under Sections 279 , 337 and 338 of IPC.
The first CMA No. 626/2002 is by Baksha Ram for
enhancement as well
