applicable to the
State of Haryana whereby the right of a co-sharer to pre-empt a sale
has been taken away during the pendency ... favour of defendant-appellants on the ground that they are co-
sharers by means of a civil suit laid before the Sub-Judge, 1st Class
applicable to the
State of Haryana whereby the right of a co-sharer to pre-empt a sale
has been taken away during the pendency ... favour of defendant-appellants on the ground that they are co-
sharers by means of a civil suit laid before the Sub-Judge, 1st Class
irrelevant. The plaintiff is one of
the co-owners of the premises. The other co-sharers being
his mother and married brother who reside ... however, found that he is one of the co-owners of
the premises the other co-sharers being his mother and
married brother, who reside
must be remembered that the plaintiff and Robert Watson and Co. were co-sharers of the lands now in suit, which the plaintiff ... common as co-sharem Robert Watson and Co. had been denying the right of the plaintiff as a co-sharer in the lands. A Commissioner
agent as to the other co-owners. Therefore, the possession of one of the co-sharers is the possession of all of them ... Every co-owner has a right to enjoyment and possession equal to that of the other co-owner and co-owners. Each co-owner
denial of right of the other co-owner and to the knowledge of the latter.
As to co-sharers, ouster must amount ... substantial building by one co-owner on the joint property even without the assent of his other co-sharers was not conclusive evidence
cannot be said that
these defendants were still co-sharers. Mr.
T.S. Deka, learned counsel for the respondents
has shown from the records that ... knowledge
of other co-owner. Thus, a co-owner, can under
law, claim title by adverse possession against
another co-owner who can, of course
there to uphold the
right of pre-emption granted to a co-sharer as a reasonable
restriction on the right to property applies with ... same
force to justify the classification of co-sharers as a class
by themselves for the purpose of vesting in them the right
limitation for filing a suit for partition is not
prescribed, a co-sharer cannot, particularly in view of
Explanation to Sub-section (1) of Section ... possession of one co-owner can be referred to his status as
co-owner, it cannot be considered adverse to other co-
owners. (See: Maharajadhiraj
relevant provisions
of the Act.
Section 227. (1) A co-sharer may sue another- for a
settlement of accounts, and for his share ... Serial.No. of Description of suit.....
Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------
15 227
By a CO-Sharer against a,
co-sharer for a' settlement
of accounts
