claim was that one Hardeo Bakhsh Singh was a co-sharer with the; defendants in the village of Bakhtawarpurwa which Was included in the town ... Zamindary Co. Ltd. v. Naresh Narayan Roy , 51 I. A. 293 : (A. I. R. (11) 1924 P. C.144) a case of co-sharers
co-owner to oust another co-owner, subject to the latter seeking relief in a Court of justice. But if the ousted co-owner does ... which the co-owner has been in possession will not determine the date when the "dispossession" of the other co sharers began
share by sale or mortgage, he should inform the co-sharers of the village and should mortgage or sell the same ... sells his share to a stranger without information to the co-sharers of the village, the said transfer shall be invalid.
3. In the wjib
most essential feature of the co-parcenary body is the joint and several responsibility of the co-sharers for the payment of the Government revenue ... that mahal and of the co-parcenary body connected with it, necessarily apply to the co-sharers of mahal B or mahal C, into which
wajib-ul-arz giving a right of pre-emption to co-sharers in the mahal. At the time of the sale the plaintiff ... co-sharer of the mahal with the vendor. Before the sale, proceedings for perfect partition of the mahal had begun. The suit was instituted
properties. The possession of one co-heir is considered in law, as possession of all the co-heirs. The co-heir in possession cannot render ... several persons, claim for some property by a co-owner cannot be opposed by other co-sharers on grounds of being in adverse possession
arises where the possession is held under an arrangement between the co-sharers.
73. The Court in P. Lakshmi Reddy (supra) quoted with approval Mitra ... knowledge of other co-owner. Thus, a co-owner, can under law, claim title by adverse possession against another co-owner who can, of course
necessary to include in the portion allotted to one co-sharer the land occupied by a dwelling house or other building in the possession ... facts were:
Mussamat Jascda was a co-sharer in the village and she owned the house. There was an auction-sale in 1885 by which
plaintiffs and refused to recognize that the latter were co-sharers and having right in the shop in dispute and on a demand having been ... possession of one co-heir is considered, in law as possession of all the co-heirs. When
one co-heir is found
village Kadipur. The allegation of the plaintiffs was that they were co-sharers in that thoh and that the defendants vendees were strangers. - The court ... that the village Kadipur comprised 2 thohs, that the plaintiffs were co-sharers in the thoh in which the property in suit was situated
