Ramesh Upadhyay, of the erstwhile hindu undivided family consisting of following
co-parcener, some of whom are the other appellant before the Tribunal ... Thrivikrama Trivikram, E Manohara Manohar and E.
Sudharshan are the co- parceners. The said HUF was never assessed to tax and it was
partitioned
parcener
in her own right in the same manner as the son. One of the incidents
of co-parcenary, being the right of a co ... availed of by any co-parcener, even a daughter who is also co-
parcener. Therefore, as regards the right of appellant No.1 of suing
made out of the loan taken in the name of co-parcener Mr. Alok B.
Sriram from ICICI Bank and the said loan ... paid through co-parcener
Mr. Alok B. Sriram. On 31.03.2011, the assessee has reimbursed a sum of
Rs.35,99,946/- to Mr. Alok
State Amendment to Hindu Succession Act, 1990, she became a co-parcener along with two other daughters of second respondent, who are the respondents ... into effect from 25.03.1989, the respondents 1, 3 & 4 became co-parceners alongwith second respondent. The second respondent is not absolute owner
income derived from the said property. The plaintiffs as co-parceners are entitled to claim share in the said properties. First defendant sold various properties ... even during the life time of their father being grandsons, being co-parceners as per Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act?
b. Whether
Hindu family governed by the
mitakshara law, the daughter of a co-parcener
shall,
(a) by birth became a co-parcener in her
own right ... that
of a son, and any reference to a Hindu Mitakshara
co-parcener shall be deemed to include a reference
to a daughter
make partition of the suit land
amongst all the co-parceners and also to earmark the water point and
the land for this purpose ... common use of all the co-parceners of the
land.
Page 2 of 5
Primarily, Mr. Biswas, learned counsel has stressed on two
issues
parceners have jointly held and enjoyed the suit
schedule properties as coparcenery properties.
Plaintiff along with other members of the family as
coparceners ... brothers was taken place as partition between
coowners and not between coparceners as alleged by
the plaintiff. It is further contended that though
Hindu
family property of which the plaintiff is one of the co-
parceners is entitled to 1/20th share in all the movable
and immovable ... karta of the joint
family. The plaintiff being one of the co-parceners is
entitled to 1/20th share in all the movable and
immovable
property was purchased in the name of
Sri Ramana Murthy Setty, co-parcener of the HUF. The assessee
contended that Sri G. R. Setty ... co-parcener of the HUF has
2
ITA No.142/Vizag/2017
Grandhi Nageswara Rao (HUF), Anakapalli
purchased the property for which the funds were
