Society For Civic Rights vs Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. on 19 June, 1991
Equivalent citations: [1991]72COMPCAS80(NULL)
ORDER
R.A. Jahagirdar, J. (Chairman ... advertisement in several newspapers in September, 1984, announcing what it called "Colgate Trigard Family Good Habits Contest". "Trigard" incidentally
Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. And Anr. vs Hindustan Lever Ltd. on 5 November, 1997
Equivalent citations: (1998)1COMPLJ171(MRTPC)
ORDER
A.N. Divecha, J. (Chairman ... ruling of the Federal Court of Australia in the case of Colgate Palmolive Pty. Ltd. v. Rexona Pty. Ltd. [1981] 37 ALR 391 ; [1981] ATPR
Director General (Investigation And ... vs Colgate Palmolive (I) Ltd. on 29 August, 2001
ORDER
C.M. Nayar, J. (Chairman)
1. A Notice of Enquiry ... respondent had indulged in the following trade practices :
(1) Bigger size of Colgate Dental Cream especially 200 gms. are artificially kept in scarcity while smaller
Nand Gopal Goyal vs Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. on 3 November, 2003
Equivalent citations: I(2004)CPJ18(MRTP)
ORDER
C.M. Nayar, Chairman ... present in person has argued that he purchased one pack of Colgate Dental Cream under the scheme where the respondent Company had dvertised
ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Ltd. , AIR 1999 Supreme Court 3105, which is reproduced ... ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Colgate Palmolive cited by the counsel for the respondent also does not come to his rescue
order dated June 19, 1991 (see Society for Civic Rights v. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. [1991] 72 Comp Cas 80 (MRTPC) [SB]-UTPE
matter of Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever ... strongly relied upon by the Counsel for the respondents in Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Ltd. (supra), Paragraphs
desirable to examine the behaviour of respondent's competitors such as Colgate, Lakme, Godrej, Ponds etc. also. It is true that an isolated study ... above order, DG investigated the pricing pattern of M/s. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. and M/s. Ponds India Ltd., which subsequently merged with
Supreme Court) (MRTP) in the matter of Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Ltd. , as below :
"As a matter of fact there
from referring to any tooth paste, manufactured by the applicant/complainant, Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd., in any manner, either directly or indirectly by means ... superiority made by the respondent qua its product, New Pepsodent over Colgate Dental Cream. The panel has since submitted its report dated the 15th June
