suit for permanent
injunction could be marked for a "collateral purposes"? The lower Court has
sustained the objection raised by the defendant that ... mark the impounded but unregistered sale deed dated
23.01.1976 for a purported collateral purpose, namely, to prove possession of
the property. But the Court below
petitioner sought to mark the
said document in the suit for collateral purpose, namely, to establish
that respondent No.1 is not in possession ... submission that even an unregistered document is admissible in
evidence for collateral purpose. She has also placed reliance on
the judgment of this Court
same is sought to be
filed as evidence of any collateral transaction not required to be
effected by registered instrument.
The present case falls under ... document requires registration, the same can be
admitted in evidence for collateral purpose i.e., for recovery of
money and not for specific performance
also held that the
document is not admissible in evidence even for collateral
purpose without registration and payment of proper stamp duty.
The lower Court ... assigned by the lower Court for not accepting
the said document for collateral purpose, viz., proving the
possession of the petitioner. The lower Court seems
Santosh Rungta and Mr. Vinay
Agarwal had given personal guarantees and collateral securities for
obtaining the loan from the APSFC and the SBI. The father ... being a shareholder, had also given personal guarantee and also
collateral security of his own house to the SBI. The other Promoter
Director, namely
that it can be challenged in any court or
even in collateral proceedings.
In order to deal with the submission of the learned Counsel based
same is sought to be filed as evidence of any collateral
transaction not required to be effected by registered instrument.
The present case falls under ... document requires registration, the same can
be admitted in evidence for collateral purpose i.e., for recovery
of money and not for specific performance
Smt. Dr. Renuka Datla And Others vs Biological E Limited And Others on 15 April
even to modify them
so long as their action is not for collateral purposes or vitiated by mala
fides; and that judicial review
state of facts. Such a decision would be in
regard to a collateral fact and can be questioned in a Civil Court
and the jurisdiction ... decision will only be
a decision regarding a jurisdictional fact or a collateral fact and
such a decision can always be questioned in a Civil
