Judge observed that "it is admissible in evidence to establish the collateral purpose of the character of the petitioner as a tenant ... deficit stamp duty and penalty before admitting the same into evidence for collateral purpose. It is this order that has been challenged in this
admissible in evidence and it cannot be looked into even for a collateral purpose. Thus, the learned District Munsif declined to mark the document ... document inasmuch as the petitioner can rely upon the same for the collateral purpose of proving the possession and enjoyment of the land pursuant
said to be not available when the same
issue is involved collaterally in competent civil
proceeding."
The learned Judge further observed:
"Ultimately, having
S. Bharat Kumar And Others vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 16 October
General is of no consequence and can be simply ignored. Such a collateral attack is not permissible. What is more, as a result ... become final and the finding recorded therein cannot be attacked in a collateral proceeding.
30. It is also not necessary for us to express
relied upon. In other words, it is subject to 'collateral attack'." (Passage quoted in Nawabkhan 's case)
The judgment ... Section 4 . Viewed from another angle, the earlier notifications being amenable to collateral attack, when once they are held to be void and inoperative
either expressly or by necessary implication. The propriety of adjustment is a collateral issue which the Commissioner is not called upon to decide ... open to the petitioner to question the same in a collateral proceeding. At any rate, he cannot request the designated authority to reopen the issue
respondent, another document in March, 1988 styled as third party collateral security was executed by Mr. K. Ashok Kumar as the constituted attorney ... interest on 1-3-1988 and also agreed to frunish collateral security for due performance of their agreement to discharge the debt with interest thereon
Ministry of Defence nor is there any allegation of any collateral motive or extraneous consideration for awarding the contract to the 5th respondent. There
countenance abuse of power or the exercise of power for a collateral purpose, because as discussed above, the discretionary power denoted by the expression
