Search Results Page

Search Results

41 - 50 of 2020 (0.42 seconds)

Rajaram vs Bhaiyalal on 5 April, 2018

evidence. The question next is whether it can be used for collateral purpose. Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908 envisages: "49. Effect ... Specific Relief Act, 1877 (3 of 1877) or as evidence of any collateral transaction not required to be effected by registered instrument. Presently, the instrument
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.Devendar Kumar vs / on 8 March, 2018

Ganga Oil Agencies have offered the said property as collateral security. The said property is owned by Smt.Chinnammal, W/o Ganapathy Naicker. Smt.Chinnammal ... false claim of A2 and A3 that the property given as collateral security is owned by Kuttiammal. The said Kuttiammal has shown as an absconding

K.Devendar Kumar vs / on 8 March, 2018

Ganga Oil Agencies have offered the said property as collateral security. The said property is owned by Smt.Chinnammal, W/o Ganapathy Naicker. Smt.Chinnammal ... false claim of A2 and A3 that the property given as collateral security is owned by Kuttiammal. The said Kuttiammal has shown as an absconding

Sita Ram Bhama vs Ramvatar Bhama on 23 March, 2018

which   was   inadmissible   in   evidence   could   have   been   used  for any   collateral   purpose.   In   a   suit   for   partition,   an unregistered   document   can   be   relied   upon ... collateral purpose   i.e.   severancy   of   title,   nature   of   possession   of various shares but not for the primary purpose i.e. division of joint properties
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Bhushan - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3 4 5   6 7 8 9 10 Next