petitioner be reconsidered for his promotion from the rank of Lt. Colonel to Acting Colonel/Colonel after ignoring the A.C.Rs. of the years ... start of reckonable service for promotion to the rank of Lt. Colonel and Colonel.
3. Undisputedly the promotion to the rank of Lt. Colonel
rejected thrice (maximum permissible chances) for the promotion to the
rank of Colonel in the Army. He was in the Engineering Discipline whereas
Shamsher Singh ... years' service were to be considered for the rank of Lt. Colonel; the
rank of Lt. Col (Time scale) was done away with
Sali, Colonel V-138P vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 12 January, 1998
Equivalent citations: (1998)118PLR625
Author: N.C. Khichi
Bench ... periodic promotions. On July 18, 1986 he was promoted, as an Acting Colonel. Vide order dated November 4, 1988, a copy of which has been
Colonel A.D.Nargolkar vs Union Of India & Ors. on 9 July, 2012
Author: Anil Kumar
Bench: Anil Kumar , Sudershan Kumar Misra ... Decision: 9.07.2012
+ W.P.(C) Nos.13360/2009 & 13367/2009
Colonel A.D. Nargolkar ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
Advocates
release the promotion of the petitioner on the rank of Colonel. The relevant facts as culled out from the pleadings of the parties ... promotion is selection based. The petitioner was duly promoted as Lieutenant Colonel on 30.8.1983. On 13.2.1985, the petitioner made an application for premature retirement
Colonel A.D.Nargolkar vs Union Of India & Ors. on 9 July, 2012
Author: Anil Kumar
Bench: Anil Kumar , Sudershan Kumar Misra ... Decision: 9.07.2012
+ W.P.(C) Nos.13360/2009 & 13367/2009
Colonel A.D. Nargolkar ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
Advocates
Through: Mr. Gopal Surbramaniam, Solicitor
General of India with Ms. Jyoti Singh,
Colonel R. Balasubramaniam (Retd.),
Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Atul Nanda,
& Mr. Ravinder ... Through: Mr. Gopal Surbramaniam, Solicitor
General of India with Ms. Jyoti Singh,
Colonel R. Balasubramaniam (Retd.),
Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Atul Nanda,
& Mr. Ravinder
Apex Court in re; Union of India and Others v. Colonel Ran Singh Rudee, (2018) 8 SCC 53, which reads as under ... Tewari has submitted that the Apex Court in re; Colonel Ran Singh Rudee (supra) has interpreted the expression 'consequential benefits
ratified and countersigned by an officer holding the rank of a Colonel. The appointment order should, therefore, be deemed to have been issued ... Colonel who ratified and countersigned the appointment order. Hence, the petitioner could not have been retired by respondent No. 3 who was an officer inferior
question of promotion of the respondent
to the post of Lt. Colonel came for consideration in May 1999 and he
was promoted. While ... holding the post of Lt. Colonel, his case
was considered for promotion to the rank of Colonel by the Selection
Board in July/August
