offences under Sections 302
and 201 IPC, as if he committed them individually. Interestingly, A-1 was
convicted for the offence under Section ... writ at large since
all the three substantive charges are for the offences being committed by all
the accused together
seriousness of the proposed charges, the
context of the events likely to lead to the making of the
charges, a reasonable possibility of the applicant ... seriousness of the proposed charges, the
context of the events likely to lead to the making of the
charges, a reasonable possibility of the applicant
depend upon proved and pending
charges against the accused and upon balancing the considerations of
individual liberty and societal interest and the prescriptions ... criminal life persistently because of the mere fact that he
has again committed an offence so soon after his discharge from a previous
one. -( Vijay
Court of
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambikapur, who, in
turn, committed the case to the Court of Session, from
where it was received on transfer ... learned Additional Session Judge acquitted
co-accused Jai Prakash of the charges framed against
him.
3. Smt. Ranjana Jaiswal, learned counsel for the
appellant argued
accused in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Bilaspur, who, in turn, committed the case to the Court
of Session Judge, who conducted the trial ... learned Session Judge acquitted co-accused Ballu alias
Naresh Kumar of the charges framed against him.
3. Shri N.L.Soni, learned counsel
Balamurugan vs State Represented By on 8 September, 2020
Author: B.Pugalendhi
Bench: B.Pugalendhi
exclusively triable by court of session, the Judicial Magistrate committed the said case to the court of session at Farrukhabad for trial ... Charges were framed under Section 302 / 34 I.P.C. against the appellants. The said charges were read over to the appellants to which they
that PWs.1,
2 and 5 are interested witnesses being members of the same
family and the Evidence of PW7 is only to the effect ... that accordingly in view of the charges
under Section 148 of IPC against all the accused for
committing rioting with deadly weapons the conviction
appellants. The offences committed by the appellants were
exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions. Therefore, the
learned Magistrate committed the case to the Sessions ... interested witnesses
may not be taken into consideration. He submitted that the
panchas have turned hostile. He has, therefore, urged that
the trial court committed
recording machine by becoming a participant in the trial evincing intelligence, active interest and elicit all relevant materials necessary for reaching the correct conclusion ... ought to have clearly noticed the mistake that was committed while framing the charges in the light of the evidence of the Ballistic Expert
