Mahender Yadav vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 4 November, 2016
Mahender Yadav vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 4 November, 2016
Bench: Gita Mittal , P
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 5978 (2.08 seconds)Mr.Swaminathan vs The Union Of India on 17 September, 2014
employee committing serious misconduct / charges fully detrimental to the interest of the bank. Thus, as the misconducts / charges committed by the petitioner has been proved ... mush as the charges / misconducts committed by the petitioner are extremely grievous in nature and fully detrimental to the interest of the Bank, the respondent
Konda Lakshmana Bapuji vs Govt. Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors on 29 January, 2002
other charges by criminal intimidation, or who
abets the doing of any of the above mentioned
acts; and also includes the successors in interest ... charges by criminal
intimidation; (4) a person who abets the doing of any of the
above mentioned acts; and (5) the successors in interest
Kirpal Singh vs State Of U.P on 10 May, 1963
think it necessary to
observe that the committing Magistrate in this case erred in
committing the accused to the Court of Session without
recording ... charges for
serious offences like murder the power and indeed a duty in
the interest of the accused, as well as in the larger
interest
Anil Thakur vs State Nct Of Delhi on 6 February, 2018
offences under Sections 302
and 201 IPC, as if he committed them individually. Interestingly, A-1 was
convicted for the offence under Section ... writ at large since
all the three substantive charges are for the offences being committed by all
the accused together
The State Of Bombay vs Ramgopal Ganpatrai Ruia on 22 June, 1951
criminal breach of trust. In our view if this rase is committed to the Court of Session, it would not amount to a waste ... time would be well spent in the interests of the commercial morality, looking to the charges which have been made against
accused
Sufian Sk vs State Of West Bengal on 14 September, 2022
charges beyond reasonable doubt and while recording an order of
conviction. Learned Trial Court relied upon evidence of interested
witnesses and committed grave error
State Of Odisha vs Dengun Sabar on 5 November, 2019
been committed in not framing charges and thereby failure of justice
has been occasioned, we feel it just and proper for the interest of
justice
Sudhansu Sekhar Nayak vs State Of Orissa on 23 February, 2018
petitioner. There
is no ground for presuming that the petitioner has committed the
offences alleged. There is no strong suspicion against the
petitioner. Submission ... learned trial Court has committed palpable error in
28
framing charges against the petitioner and as such, in the
interest of justice, the impugned order
C.V. Pandurangaiah Shetty vs N.S. Lakshmipathaiah Shetty on 2 April, 2016
accordance
with law by imposing cost, penalty and charges together with
interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
4. The epitomized facts projected from ... accordance with law by imposing cost,
penalty and charges together with interest at the rate of 12% per
annum.
27. At the very outset