furtherance of their common intention
co-accused Shrinath assaulted Rajesh Kushwaha by scissor with intent to kill
him and thus they murdered him, Vinay Chouhan ... furtherance of their common intention co-accused Shrinath
assaulted Rajesh Kushwaha by scissor with intent to kill him. Thus, they
murdered Rajesh Kushwaha.
39. Accordingly
reasonable doubt that accused Dhuman and
accused Ghasite having formed a common intention,
murdered deceased Gungun, made an attempt to murder
Raghunath and caused simple ... assembly is not proved in respect of the crime, but the
common intention of committing crime is proved against
some of them, they
Arun Kumar in Section 34 IPC
furtherance of their common
intention to commit murder.
Causing hurt to Sanjay by Section 324 r/w
means ... Accused Mahinder inflicted
knife blows in furtherance of
their common intention to
commit murder.
Ajay Kumar Having caught hold of Sanjay Section
brought any material to establish that the
appellant also shared common intention of committing murder of
the deceased.
21. The ambit and scope of Section ... accused had any common intention in
relation thereto. Brijnandan Prasad alone was, thus,
responsible therefor. Had the other accused shared
common intention with Brijnandan Prasad
failed to prove that
the four convicts shared the common intention to commit the murder
of Ranjit, but even the number of persons involved ... they did not share the common
intention to commit the murder of Ranjit.
9. Mr.Ajay Verma, learned counsel for convict Ashish @ Kali,
while seeking
satisfactorily established. It is proved beyond doubt
that the appellants, with common intention,
murdered deceased Laadkunwar.
5. Shri S.Mukherjee, learned amicus curiae
contended that ... arriving at a conclusion of existence of common
intention. At best, it was a case of similar intention
for appellant No.2.
23. In Hiralal
recorded to show as if it was a case
of murder with common intention. Sri Singh, learned senior counsel
has further argued that ... argued that if it was pre -planned murder or it was
murder with common intention then there was no restriction for the
accused to kill
mind that all the
appellants shared a common intention to murder the victim. Presence of
the appellants at the spot and their specific roles ... murderous
assault on the victim clearly evidencing their common intention to murder
of the victim.
In Pankaj vs. State of Rajasthan
account of the eye-witnesses that all the appellants shared
common intention to murder Shivbagas and Shivbagas
having died homicidal death, conviction of appellant ... house itself. This act of the appellants manifests
their common intention to murder and therefore, homicidal
death of Shivbagas due to fatal injury caused
sons and it cannot be said that he shared common
intention of murdering the victims.
Hence, I am of the opinion that in the absence ... Tapan, they cannot be said to
have shared the common intention of murdering the victims who sustained
injuries in the course of a free fight
