India;
commission of terrorist acts; criminal conspiracy to commit murder;
criminal conspiracy, common ... intention and abetment to commit murder;
committing murder of a number of persons; attempt to murder with common
intention; criminal conspiracy and abetment; abduction
Murder Reference No. 6 of 2011
head of Kamaljit Singh and fired. It is also submitted that in the statement
(Ex.PB) Baldev Singh (complainant ... submitted that there was no
common intention on the part of Tejinder Bawa @ Happy (appellant) to
commit the alleged murder of Kamaljit Singh @ Sonu (deceased
been any intentions to get the deceased murdered she would have been murdered before 26.11.2000 but nobody will take chance of murdering at the time ... intention to murder Suman and in such a view to hold the appellants guilty of the murder with the aid of common intention is illegal
accused 2 to 4
who in furtherance of their common intention
committed the murder and there is no reason to
interfere with the conviction ... succeed in establishing
that in furtherance of the common intention,
the appellants committed murder of deceased
Venkittakumar. Hence conviction can only be set
aside
common intention of truth. It is not
enough to have the same independently of each another. Though
it is true that the common intention ... material
to indicate that the said appellant shared the common intention of
committing murder of the deceased, the others cannot be
convicted with
assuming that they had a common intention with the 1st
accused to cause injuries on the deceased, a common intention
Crl.Appeal Nos.2165 ... contend
that similar intention has to be distinguished from common
intention. At any rate, a common intention for accused 2 and 3
along with accused
meeting of mind and these
appellants have shared common intention to murder the deceased.
The appellants have relied upon the judgments reported in the case ... meeting of mind and
11
they had shared common intention to murder the deceased. It was
also stated that after the incident, all of them
meeting of mind and these
appellants have shared common intention to murder the deceased.
The appellants have relied upon the judgments reported in the case ... meeting of mind and
11
they had shared common intention to murder the deceased. It was
also stated that after the incident, all of them
prosecution allege that the accused with the common
intention of committing murder of Rajesh Krishnan (deceased)
obstructed him while he was driving his motorcycle ... cannot be held to have shared the common
intention to commit murder. At best, he could be convicted only
for his individual act namely
meeting of mind and these
appellants have shared common intention to murder the deceased.
The appellants have relied upon the judgments reported in the case ... meeting of mind and
11
they had shared common intention to murder the deceased. It was
also stated that after the incident, all of them
