gone for the
purchase of the reserved plots under the sanctioned
scheme, which assures open space, are entitled to the
enjoyment of the lung space ... purchasers of the plots
in the sanctioned layout have the vested right for
enjoying the common area fully. The Corporation and the
owner have
gone for the purchase of the reserved plots under the sanctioned scheme, which assures open space, are entitled to the enjoyment of the lung space ... purchasers of the plots in the sanctioned layout have the vested right for enjoying the common area fully. The Corporation and the owner have
valid. However, fresh application was submitted for putting up construction in Plot Nos.276 and 369 and the same was rejected by the Corporation, which ... housing plots cannot be accepted. The learned Judge has rightly held that the Government has no power to de-reserve the open space and that
common ancestral family property. It is true that the property has been purchased by the plaintiffs as a house plot and after purchase, they constructed ... access to the length of 10 feet thatched house and 10 feet open verandah without wall, totally 20 feet length. At the time of constructing
The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs M/S. Mecca Prime Tannery on 23 July, 2012
M/S.Foxconn India Developer (P) Ltd vs The Income Tax Officer on 30 April
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Sanghvi And Doshi Enterprise on 1 November
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Arun Excello Foundations Pvt. Ltd on 18 October
M.R.Srinivasan vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 27 August, 2012
Author: K.N
D.Mohan vs The Sub Registrar on 7 June, 2012
Author: Vinod K.Sharma
Bench
