K. Rama Rao, vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 December, 2018
Author: Chief Justice
plots have been
given specific plot numbers, whereas the areas which have been
earmarked as open spaces meant for common
purposes/amenities have not been ... having purchased the
plots, the legitimate expectation was that the plots, which have
been shown as earmarked for open spaces or common
amenities, will
Government declared
the entire 110 acres as a single plot without any reduction
towards common amenities and green space etc. for the purpose
of granting ... Area 41.75 Acres(100%)
Plotted Area 26.65 Acres(64.07%)
Roads Area 4.82 Acres (11.55%)
Open space 4.29 Acres (10.27%)
Common amenities(in 1997)5.89 Acres
A.P. High Court Employees Mutually ... vs The State Of Felangana, on 28 December, 2018
The A.P. High Court Employees Mutually ... vs The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Special
K.Daulat Kumar,A.R., High Court Of Ap., ... vs Govt Of Ap., Spl.Chief
P. Nagarjuna Rao 6 Ors, vs The Dist. Coop. Officer Another, on 28 December, 2018
G.Devender, vs State Of Telangana, on 28 December, 2018
Author: Chief Justice
Bench: Chief
Open
Plot No.141, admeasuring 667 square yards. In the said document, it is
mentioned that Mr. Dayanand Gupta purchased the said Plot ... property is earmarked for common amenities/commercial and respondent
Nos.4 and 5 cannot claim that it is open plots consists of Plot
2019, dated
15.10.2019 on the ground that the open land bearing Plot No.171,
admeasuring 500 square yards or 417.698 square meters ... Nuthi Subba Lakshmi and her sons,
whose common ancestor Nuthi Subramanyam had earlier purchased
said open Plot No.171 through registered sale deed vide document