prefix "BRU" have been given. On this basis, he also contended that when the trade mark with prefix "BRU" is commonly ... learned counsel for the appellant that the prefixed word "BRU" is in common use in respect of many other Pharmaceutical products is concerned
fidely adopted the mark applied for and that the prefix "DERMA / DERM" are common to the trade and that the suffix ... respondent's mark is 'DERMASOFT. Though the prefix 'DERMA' is common, the suffix word 'GEN' in the impugned mark
filed any evidence in support of their contention that WIN is a common suffix in the pharmaceutical trade. He submitted that an average person with ... different as the' prefixes are completely different. He contended that WIN as a prefix is also quite common in the trade and cited
contention that the prefix of the word should be given due weightage and importance in case the suffix is common.
The case of Biofarma
TENORMIN' was common and that there were so many others using the word TENO as prefix to their trade mark. He argued that there
deceived or cause confusion. In the said case, the addition of the prefix 'Me' has made a change leading to distinctiveness of both ... only 'A' as a vowel which is common in both the marks but there is something more, a consonant
with 'BLACK LABEL' as suffix. Thus, they have developed a common law right by virtue or provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section ... essential feature of the appellant's mark is 'KALYANI' (prefix) whereas the essential feature of the respondent's mark
laudatory/descriptive epithet when it is read in conjunction with the prefix 'Super' or suffix 'Big detergent bar' and as such ... page 124 while dealing with the marks which consist of ordinary and commonly used descriptive terms which are likely to be used by traders
Kirorimal Kashiram Marketing And ... vs Shri Ravinder Kumar Khanna Trading As ... on 19 March, 2008
Beecham Group Plc. vs S.R.K. Pharmaceuticals on 29 January, 2004
Equivalent citations: 2004
